Science
Get idea
Fabricate evidence
Develop theory based on fabricated evidence
Present theory as truth
Slander anyone who disagrees with theory based on fabricated evidence
Ridicule differing beliefs
Ignore Truths based on differing viewpoints
Persecute anyone who disagrees with theory based on fabricated evidence
Faith
Believe the word of God
(Enjoy the continuing scientific and Archeological evidence that supports the Word)
I takes more faith not to believe.
If I am wrong then nothing happens
But what if you are wrong?
The IDEA of this chart seems to IGNORE CONTRADICTING EVIDENCE of the many scientists who had FAITH in God and the Bible, yet developed theories and advanced our knowledge to help us BETTER UNDERSTAND THE UNIVERSE.
To name just a few…
Galileo Galilei, Johannes Kepler, Michael Faraday, Gregor Mendel, Isaac Newton, Nicolaus Copernicus, Benjamin Franklin, George Washington Carver, Leonardo da Vinci, Francis Bacon.
The truth is that anybody willing to seek truth, whether they have faith in God or not, is able to help us better understand the universe. A belief in God does not preclude rational thought on my part, even if you think he doesn’t exist. And your disbelief does not prevent you from discovering how God designed the universe.
If science truly worked that way all the time, we’d be a lot better off. Too often in science that supports evolutionary theory, the path after No on the “Does the evidence support the idea” decision block is something along these lines:
Redefine your assumptions to make the results you get match the idea you had.
And that path points toward the “good theory” block any way.
Faith bashing, how original. Honestly stuff like this just brings out the worst on either side while sane people who are not self obsessed really don’t care too much, they’re just trying to pay the bills and get by. It doesn’t matter if you prefer creatonism or evolution, and the rest of us don’t care what what you believe in anyway. Your time could be better spent with your family, get a life douchebags
Looks like another myopic view of putting your faith in a flowchart, because it has a lot of boxes in it and looks “sophisticated”. Ever wonder who created the science that you worship?
All individual PEOPLE are of equal worth…all religions and cultures are NOT.
well, if you think science and faith have different origins, your charts may be correct. now, if you think, science and faith comes from god, ’cause god is the source of every knowledge, as he/she is the source of everything, (sounds a bit “gnostic”, but that’s the way sufis like me consider the matter), you have to merge the two charts, i fear. ;)
It’s a shame God would have to exist before he could create anything. That seems to be the biggest fault in the religious way of thinking. And Chucklez is right, that the time making the flow chart would be better spent with the family, but you could say that about anything. Very little would actually get done if all we did was spend time with family. I think this chart, though obviously meant to be humorous, pretty much proves it’s own point when religious people react by posting poison on the comments. It’s actually very interesting to see how defensive people get to a simple image. Like Muhammad with a bomb in his turban, eh? Less extreme, but it comes from the same place, eh?
Oh, and the “what if your wrong” argument is useless because it assumes that there are only two options. This is a very Christian way of thinking, so I don’t completely blame the author. I think Dawkins put it best.
The Best Article Every day powered by WordPress - BloggingPro theme by: Design Disease Please contact us to notify of content that infringes your rights.
15 Responses
david
December 29th, 2007 at 12:59 pm
1so are we just going to ignore the slanted test of most scientist and the inaccurate testing methods they use?
and the fact that there are many scientists who have come up results that support Christianity time and time again?
Science vs. faith flowchart « Satur9’s World
December 29th, 2007 at 1:10 pm
2[...] Science vs. faith flowchart Haha. [...]
Trumpi
December 29th, 2007 at 1:36 pm
3This looks like a faith based flowchart…
Ted
December 29th, 2007 at 2:19 pm
4Science
Get idea
Fabricate evidence
Develop theory based on fabricated evidence
Present theory as truth
Slander anyone who disagrees with theory based on fabricated evidence
Ridicule differing beliefs
Ignore Truths based on differing viewpoints
Persecute anyone who disagrees with theory based on fabricated evidence
Faith
Believe the word of God
(Enjoy the continuing scientific and Archeological evidence that supports the Word)
I takes more faith not to believe.
If I am wrong then nothing happens
But what if you are wrong?
Brent
December 29th, 2007 at 3:03 pm
5The IDEA of this chart seems to IGNORE CONTRADICTING EVIDENCE of the many scientists who had FAITH in God and the Bible, yet developed theories and advanced our knowledge to help us BETTER UNDERSTAND THE UNIVERSE.
To name just a few…
Galileo Galilei, Johannes Kepler, Michael Faraday, Gregor Mendel, Isaac Newton, Nicolaus Copernicus, Benjamin Franklin, George Washington Carver, Leonardo da Vinci, Francis Bacon.
The truth is that anybody willing to seek truth, whether they have faith in God or not, is able to help us better understand the universe. A belief in God does not preclude rational thought on my part, even if you think he doesn’t exist. And your disbelief does not prevent you from discovering how God designed the universe.
BushCrimeFamily
December 29th, 2007 at 3:10 pm
6How sad that you holy rollers can’t handle the truth about anything.
Gary Petersen
December 29th, 2007 at 3:16 pm
7If science truly worked that way all the time, we’d be a lot better off. Too often in science that supports evolutionary theory, the path after No on the “Does the evidence support the idea” decision block is something along these lines:
Redefine your assumptions to make the results you get match the idea you had.
And that path points toward the “good theory” block any way.
Chucklez
December 29th, 2007 at 4:12 pm
8Faith bashing, how original. Honestly stuff like this just brings out the worst on either side while sane people who are not self obsessed really don’t care too much, they’re just trying to pay the bills and get by. It doesn’t matter if you prefer creatonism or evolution, and the rest of us don’t care what what you believe in anyway. Your time could be better spent with your family, get a life douchebags
Kin
December 30th, 2007 at 8:21 am
9Amen to that, Chucklez.
Jeff
December 30th, 2007 at 9:12 am
10Looks like another myopic view of putting your faith in a flowchart, because it has a lot of boxes in it and looks “sophisticated”. Ever wonder who created the science that you worship?
All individual PEOPLE are of equal worth…all religions and cultures are NOT.
blitzkaefer
December 30th, 2007 at 1:35 pm
11I for one refuse to support organized crime nor religion.
“Convictions are more dangerous foes of truth than lies.”
Friedrich Nietzsche
altay
December 31st, 2007 at 2:55 am
12well, if you think science and faith have different origins, your charts may be correct. now, if you think, science and faith comes from god, ’cause god is the source of every knowledge, as he/she is the source of everything, (sounds a bit “gnostic”, but that’s the way sufis like me consider the matter), you have to merge the two charts, i fear. ;)
uzi
January 1st, 2008 at 1:26 pm
13It’s a shame God would have to exist before he could create anything. That seems to be the biggest fault in the religious way of thinking. And Chucklez is right, that the time making the flow chart would be better spent with the family, but you could say that about anything. Very little would actually get done if all we did was spend time with family. I think this chart, though obviously meant to be humorous, pretty much proves it’s own point when religious people react by posting poison on the comments. It’s actually very interesting to see how defensive people get to a simple image. Like Muhammad with a bomb in his turban, eh? Less extreme, but it comes from the same place, eh?
Oh, and the “what if your wrong” argument is useless because it assumes that there are only two options. This is a very Christian way of thinking, so I don’t completely blame the author. I think Dawkins put it best.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mmskXXetcg&feature=related
Johnny K – Science vs Faith
January 5th, 2008 at 5:36 pm
14[...] Via: The Best Article Every day | Tags: science [...]
Bemused
January 9th, 2008 at 8:27 am
15`
Well, I’ve read all the comments but…
WHERE IS THE FLOW CHART???
`
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
Time Machine
Recent Posts
Archives
Referrals
Subscribe
Recent Entries
Recent Comments
Most Commented
The Best Article Every day powered by WordPress - BloggingPro theme by: Design Disease Please contact us to notify of content that infringes your rights.