<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 Firefox 3 Features</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bspcn.com/2008/05/22/top-10-firefox-3-features/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bspcn.com/2008/05/22/top-10-firefox-3-features/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:35:18 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ankur Baranwal</title>
		<link>http://www.bspcn.com/2008/05/22/top-10-firefox-3-features/comment-page-1/#comment-19329</link>
		<dc:creator>Ankur Baranwal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 04:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bspcn.com/2008/05/22/top-10-firefox-3-features/#comment-19329</guid>
		<description>What? This graph is blatantly lying. IE uses more memory than Firefox!!??!!  I don&#039;t know about Vista and Firefox 3, but I have seen many PC&#039;s running XP with IE 6/7 and Firefox 2. IE with twelve dozen tabs open won&#039;t take as much memory as Firefox that has been in use for an hour through many tabs, even though only 3 or 4 are currently open. I have screenshots of my Firefox 2 using 700MB out of 1.2GB RAM. It&#039;s a known bug--they call it a feature that increases speed, but it obviously doesn&#039;t.

I am positive about the following (Firefox 2, Opera 9.5)

Memory Usage: Firefox&gt;Opera&gt;IE
Browsing Speed: Opera&gt;IE6&gt;IE7&gt;Firefox 2&gt;Firefox 1.5
(Gmail however works best in Firefox)
Launching Time: IE&gt;Opera&gt;Firefox
Security: Opera~Firefox&gt;&gt;IE7&gt;IE6

Firefox is a bad browser in almost every way, except that it has amazing options for add-ons. One can never get rid of IE and Firefox because they are so widely used that most pages are designed keeping them in mind.

Otherwise, as someone&#039;s mentioned before me, Opera Rules!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What? This graph is blatantly lying. IE uses more memory than Firefox!!??!!  I don&#8217;t know about Vista and Firefox 3, but I have seen many PC&#8217;s running XP with IE 6/7 and Firefox 2. IE with twelve dozen tabs open won&#8217;t take as much memory as Firefox that has been in use for an hour through many tabs, even though only 3 or 4 are currently open. I have screenshots of my Firefox 2 using 700MB out of 1.2GB RAM. It&#8217;s a known bug&#8211;they call it a feature that increases speed, but it obviously doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I am positive about the following (Firefox 2, Opera 9.5)</p>
<p>Memory Usage: Firefox&gt;Opera&gt;IE<br />
Browsing Speed: Opera&gt;IE6&gt;IE7&gt;Firefox 2&gt;Firefox 1.5<br />
(Gmail however works best in Firefox)<br />
Launching Time: IE&gt;Opera&gt;Firefox<br />
Security: Opera~Firefox&gt;&gt;IE7&gt;IE6</p>
<p>Firefox is a bad browser in almost every way, except that it has amazing options for add-ons. One can never get rid of IE and Firefox because they are so widely used that most pages are designed keeping them in mind.</p>
<p>Otherwise, as someone&#8217;s mentioned before me, Opera Rules!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.513 seconds -->
