<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Ten Grammar Myths</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bspcn.com/2008/03/08/top-ten-grammar-myths/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bspcn.com/2008/03/08/top-ten-grammar-myths/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:25:47 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: balkaster</title>
		<link>http://www.bspcn.com/2008/03/08/top-ten-grammar-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-33000</link>
		<dc:creator>balkaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 15:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bspcn.com/2008/03/08/top-ten-grammar-myths/#comment-33000</guid>
		<description>&quot;Never begin a sentence with &#039;however&#039;&quot;?  Since when?  Sticking a comma after anything doesn&#039;t automatically make it acceptable if it&#039;s not normally otherwise.  It&#039;s perfectly acceptable to begin a sentence with &quot;however&quot; AS LONG AS IT IS ACTUALLY A SENTENCE.  Simply beginning an orphaned phrase with &quot;however&quot; does not make it a sentence, which is the actual &quot;rule&quot; (i.e. a common error among early school students) that I think you meant.  &quot;Irregardless&quot; is NOT a word; I&#039;ve no doubt many ignorant people use it, but that doesn&#039;t make it acceptable.  It&#039;s a double negative, and it means &quot;without without regard to&quot;.  The proper way of saying this would be &quot;regarding&quot; or &quot;in regard to&quot;, but &quot;irregardless&quot; is universally used in place of &quot;regardless&quot;, and never at any other time.  So, not only is it not a real word, it&#039;s NEVER used CORRECTLY.  Please don&#039;t encourage people to continue using it.   &quot;Phrasal verbs&quot;?  I think you mean idiomatic verb usage, unless they&#039;ve recently changed the terminology.  Yes, it&#039;s fine to end a sentence with an idiom that ends with a preposition, but it&#039;s lazy and ungrammatical to end with a preposition at any other time.  There is always a better way to restate a sentence without ending with a preposition, and it&#039;s only &quot;stuffy&quot; or &quot;stilted&quot; to people who can&#039;t be bothered with the mental effort.  I suspect you are an adherent of this new movement to take English back to a pre-Industrial age before the advent of dictionaries, in which spelling and grammar were random, and language was hopelessly imprecise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Never begin a sentence with &#8216;however&#8217;&#8221;?  Since when?  Sticking a comma after anything doesn&#8217;t automatically make it acceptable if it&#8217;s not normally otherwise.  It&#8217;s perfectly acceptable to begin a sentence with &#8220;however&#8221; AS LONG AS IT IS ACTUALLY A SENTENCE.  Simply beginning an orphaned phrase with &#8220;however&#8221; does not make it a sentence, which is the actual &#8220;rule&#8221; (i.e. a common error among early school students) that I think you meant.  &#8220;Irregardless&#8221; is NOT a word; I&#8217;ve no doubt many ignorant people use it, but that doesn&#8217;t make it acceptable.  It&#8217;s a double negative, and it means &#8220;without without regard to&#8221;.  The proper way of saying this would be &#8220;regarding&#8221; or &#8220;in regard to&#8221;, but &#8220;irregardless&#8221; is universally used in place of &#8220;regardless&#8221;, and never at any other time.  So, not only is it not a real word, it&#8217;s NEVER used CORRECTLY.  Please don&#8217;t encourage people to continue using it.   &#8220;Phrasal verbs&#8221;?  I think you mean idiomatic verb usage, unless they&#8217;ve recently changed the terminology.  Yes, it&#8217;s fine to end a sentence with an idiom that ends with a preposition, but it&#8217;s lazy and ungrammatical to end with a preposition at any other time.  There is always a better way to restate a sentence without ending with a preposition, and it&#8217;s only &#8220;stuffy&#8221; or &#8220;stilted&#8221; to people who can&#8217;t be bothered with the mental effort.  I suspect you are an adherent of this new movement to take English back to a pre-Industrial age before the advent of dictionaries, in which spelling and grammar were random, and language was hopelessly imprecise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.570 seconds -->
