<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 Grammar Mistakes That Make You Look Stupid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bspcn.com/2007/05/16/10-grammar-mistakes-that-make-you-look-stupid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bspcn.com/2007/05/16/10-grammar-mistakes-that-make-you-look-stupid/</link>
	<description>Bspcn.Com</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 07:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Emilie</title>
		<link>http://www.bspcn.com/2007/05/16/10-grammar-mistakes-that-make-you-look-stupid/#comment-15856</link>
		<dc:creator>Emilie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 03:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bspcn.com/2007/05/16/10-grammar-mistakes-that-make-you-look-stupid/#comment-15856</guid>
		<description>About the Bonus part, my pet peeve is and always will be 'new and improved.' 
How can it be new, therefore unpreceded and original, and improved, a better version of a previous concept?
WRONG!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About the Bonus part, my pet peeve is and always will be &#8216;new and improved.&#8217;<br />
How can it be new, therefore unpreceded and original, and improved, a better version of a previous concept?<br />
WRONG!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.249 seconds -->
